Home

What do you think of the EPA declaration of CO2 as a toxic pollutant?

Jeff Alberts's picture

Posted 12/07/2009 - 19:46 by Jeff Alberts

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
  •   
    1100 reads
      
Vomitous!

Vomitous!

Posted by Sonicfrog (not verified) on Tue, 12/08/2009 - 22:00
Hey... who turned off my

Hey... who turned off my spell checquer?????

Posted by sonicfrog (not verified) on Wed, 01/06/2010 - 10:32
Yer spell checker don't work

Yer spell checker don't work here, boy! ;)

Posted by Jeff Alberts on Wed, 01/06/2010 - 20:10
Evil, is the word that comes

Evil, is the word that comes to mind. Did you know that in US submarines they let CO2 levels reach 11,000ppm, with beneficial calming efects to the crew. The more CO2 we release, the more we promote global biomas, it is plant food not a poison. Whats more, it makes its own way to the third world etc without needing to be delivered.

Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 04/25/2010 - 05:32
I agree that CO2 is important

I agree that CO2 is important to promote biomass, but I'm unsure of your submarine reference. Do you have a cite for that?

Posted by Jeff Alberts on Sun, 04/25/2010 - 15:36
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <sup> <sub> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Notifications
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.
Syndicate content Syndicate content